Although the Vietnam and Korean Wars were extremely
different in most aspects they both led to a turning away from progressive American
values to an attempt to install the sort of narrowly controlled country that caused most
American families to immigrate from Europe. The anti-war movement during the 1960s was
right in the general idea that we had no real national interests in Vietnam, and that
the "Domino Theory" was inapplicable. However, the movement was top-heavy with
extremely left-wing groups and political coalitions with no grounding in reality.
Theatrical displays such as the exorcism of the Pentagon were ridiculous, trivialized
the real issues involved and offended people. It is important to understand, though,
that Richard Nixon was not elected in 1968 because he was so conservative, but because
he claimed to have a "secret plan" to end the war. Nixon was the peace candidate among
the two major parties (at least after the assassination of Robert
Kennedy).
It was the failure of Nixon to deliver that led
to the later excesses of the peace movement, that and his administration's disregard for
the laws they claimed to respect. Unfortunately, the reaction of the anti-war movement
on the surface was so offensive that it frightened people into allowing the swing to the
right, although at the same time the majority of Americans did come to believe that the
war was wrong. The real problem was that the reaction of the right-wing and the
administration came so close to actually fomenting a civil war here in America (combined
with the Black Panthers, Yippie, Kent State, the "Silent Majority", etc.) that the war
had to be ended. Still, the realization that our country had become so polarized
instead of leading to more open public discourse led the administration farther to the
right and the average voter allowed it, not knowing how else to deal with what really
looked like looming anarchy. Much like the 1968 Tet offensive, it looked worse on TV
than it actually was.
The normal economic drop at the end
of a war naturally followed, and this plus Watergate led to massive disillusionment.
Carter succeeded in restoring a certain amount of respect and confidence in the
government, but the economy and the military had been ravaged by the Nixon and Ford
years. Since Nixon's misuse of the CIA had caused loss of trust in them, also, that
agency had to be restructured. Carter's administration succeeded at setting in place a
large number of programs which did fix these things, but they took time to work. The
fear Americans had about the world caused them to take shelter in the soothing rhetoric
of Reagan, who of course took credit for all the programs Carter initiated (Strategic
Defense Initiative, Unified Special Operations Command, restructuring the CIA, and a
slew of economic programs). Carter's support for the Afghans fighting the USSR (and the
eventual success of Truman's Containment Policy) led to the collapse of the Soviet
Union, which Reagan also took credit for. All these things together have been the
public face of a swing to the right in the decades since Vietnam. Unfortunately, below
the surface is a much uglier face, the rise of the corporate state supported by
government propaganda. Unlike Nazi Germany, however, we do not have a fascist
government controlling the corporations, we have corporations controlling the
government. That is an improvement.