Sunday, September 30, 2012

In chapter nine of Grendel, what ironies occur?

In chapter nine of Gardner's Grendel,
irony is present in the interactions between Grendel and the
priests:


readability="10">

"Great spirit," the chief of the priests wails,
"ghostly Destroyer, defend the people of Scyld and kill their enemy, the terrible
world-rim-walker
[Grendel]!"



The priest prays
for Grendel's destruction while Grendel listens and waits for someone to come kill him,
which is ironic.  But the irony increases when Grendel poses as the Destroyer
himself. 


At midnight, with Grendel sitting in the ring of
the gods, Ork comes and asks who is there.  Grendel
replies:



"It
is I," I say.  "The
Destroyer."



Grendel, the
nihilist and atheist, poses as the god the priests pray to for Grendel's destruction. 
That is ironic.


The irony is heightened still further when
Ork sees his visitation or vision as
confirmation that he is correct in his theories and beliefs.  Grendel, the being who
detests the pattern-making of humans, laughingly contributes to the confirmation of the
patterns envisioned by Ork. 

Where does Rumble Fish take place?

Rumble Fish takes place in a southwestern town.  It is not clearly identified in the book, but the author has said that it is her hometown of Tulsa, Oklahoma.  In the work, the characters live on the 'wrong' side of town and most of the action takes place at night.

How can we relate (or not) the ideas of John and the controller to materialism?

Brave New World, unfortunately, has
been an accurate prediction of the modern world's obsession with "mass" (mass
production, mass media, big cars and houses) and the desire for pleasure (orgy-porgy,
soma, and sports).


Whereas John is the tortured artistic
and Christian hero of the satire (the one who dies for the materialistic sins of
others), the Controller and his subjects are, like most Americans, obsessed with
pleasure: quick-and-easy meals, sex without consequence, pornography, sugary snacks, our
jobs, clothes, social class privileges, and instant gratification when it comes to,
well, just about everything.  "Must have coffee!"


In his
essay "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman
writes:


readability="12">

Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture,
preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal
bumblepuppy...He believed that it is far more likely that the Western democracies will
dance and dream themselves into oblivion than march in to it, single file and
manacled.



And Richard H.
Beckham argues, in "World as Social Irritant: Ban it or Buy
It?":



Lest
the pleasure of frequent and promiscuous sexual activity not be sufficient to distract
the population and dissuade them from rebellion, Huxley foresees a culture in which
widespread and addictive use of drugs offers a second means of assuring a frictionless
society. “A Soma in time saves nine,”—a hypnopaedic slogan drilled into the heads of
Brave New Worldians from nursery days on—conveys the message that individuals are to
protect themselves from normal pain by frequent doses of this widely available and
socially acceptable narcotic.


Saturday, September 29, 2012

In That was Then, This is Now, what are some metaphorical symbols that reflect Bryon's personality? What would be the significance of these...

Bryon is a young man trying to find his way in the world.  He likes being a kid, likes having fun and getting into adventures, but as he gets older he starts to understand the consequences of his actions.  As he does so, he becomes morally responsible, although his guilt over hurting people he loves leaves him emotionally wrecked.  Here are some symbols from the story that sum up Bryon. 

Charlie's car -- The police give Charlie's car to Bryon and Mark.  It is a symbol of responsibility because it is a grown-up object and because it was Charlie's, the man who was most like a father figure to Bryon.

Broken Bottle -- This symbolizes Bryon's desire for adventure.  He likes fights because of the adrenaline, and even when he starts to question the reasons for fighting, he still admits that he enjoys the fight itself.

Pool Cue -- This is also Bryon's desire for fun and adventure, as well as for friendship.  He and Mark spent a lot of time at the pool hall, hustling people for money.  It is that action, however, that causes Charlie's death and leads to Bryon's coming of age.

M&M's Peace Symbol -- Bryon like M&M, even if he is a "little weird".  The peace symbol is symbolic of the peace that Bryon wants to have in his world.  He can't accept that his need to do the right thing has led to a rift between him and Mark - up to the very end, he keeps seeking Mark out in hopes that Mark will forgive him. 

what statments do witches and macbeth make about "foul and fair"? what meaning does each remark have...

"Fair is foul and foul is fair" also refers to Macbeth's quest to be king. In order to be "fair" to Macbeth's talents and potential, he must have the opportunity to become king, at least according to Lady Macbeth and, later, Macbeth.  However, the murderous methods employed are a "foul" means to this goal.  In addition, the battle takes place in Dunsinane is "foul" as is all violence; however, in order to bring justice ("fair"), a battle must ensue to strip Macbeth of his tyrannical, murderous reign.

What is the main thesis in Foucault's essay titled "What is an author"? Could anyone explain the aim of the essay?

This is the thesis (for what it is worth) -
look at the explanation below the quote and read the study guide links. Critical theory
is difficult and I find Foucault one of the most confusing. Reading Roland Barthes may
help you to understand Foucault.  I hope this
helps.


"It is obviously insufficient to
repeat empty slogans: the author has disappeared; God and man dies a common death.
Rather, we should reexamine the empty space left by the author's disappearance; we
should attentively observe, along its gaps and fault lines, its new demarcations, and
the reapportionment of this void; we should await the fluid functions released by this
disappearance," (121).


Foucault wants to discuss the
relationship between an author and a text, and the manner in which the text points to
the author as a figure who is outside the text, and who precedes the text (and creates
it). Eventually, Foucault will talk about the author as a Derridean "center" of the
text, the place which originates the text yet remains outside it. (Then, of course, he
will "deconstruct" that center/author).


In dealing with the
"author" as a function of discourse, we must consider the characteristics of a discourse
that support this use and determine its differences from other discourses. If we limit
our remarks only to those books or texts with authors, we can isolate four different
features.


First, they are objects of appropriation; the
form of property they have become is of a particular type whose legal codification was
accomplished some years ago.


Secondly, the
"author-function" is not universal or constant in all discourse. Even within our
civilization, the same types of texts have not always required authors; there was a time
when those texts which we now call "literary" (stories, folk tales, epics and tragedies)
were accepted, circulated and valorized without any questions about the identity of
their author.


At the same time, however, "literary"
discourse was acceptable only if it carried an author's name; every text of poetry or
fiction was obliged to state its author and the date, place, and circumstance of its
writing.


The third point concerning this "author-function"
is that it is not formed spontaneously through the simple attribution of a discourse to
an individual.

Why does Atticus ask Bob Ewell to write out his name? What does the jury see when he does this?This answer will be found in chapter 17.

He wants to show that Ewell is left-handed.  Tom's left arm was injured, and he cannot use his left hand. Mayella's right eye was blackened, as Scout observes, indicating that a left-handed man probably beat her up, which makes it likely that Ewell, not Tom, is the guilty one.

Why is John called "savage" in Brave New World?

John is called the savage because he grew up on the
reservation in New Mexico where all the "savages" live.  Because of that, his ways are
really strange in the eyes of the "civilized" people.


His
childhood was totally painful.  All the Indian women hated his mom because she acted (in
their opinion) like a whore (she had the values of "civilization").  None of the kids
liked him because of that as well.


He feels he is bound by
the laws of the society where he grew up, though.  He believes in their morality and the
morality he has picked up from Shakespeare plays.


So he is
an outcast in two societies, which is why he ends up killing himself, I
believe.

Relate Montag's childhood experience with the sieve and the sand to his difficulty reading and understanding his books.

The episode of the sieve and the sand for Montag in
Fahrenheit 451 is comparable to his inability to understand what he
reads. 


Just as he couldn't fill the sieve no matter how
fast he filled it with sand, Montag, no matter how much or how fast he reads,
can't comprehend it, at least not at the time the narrator tells about the
incident. 


But it is also indicative of what Montag must
try to do--read as fast and furiously as he can so that he can experience the reading
before it is taken away.  If he reads fast enough, maybe he'll fill the sieve,
figuratively. 


Montag is already trying to memorize what he
reads while on his way to Faber, during the scene in which the memory of the sieve and
the sand is revealed, but he keeps getting interrupted by a
commercial. 

Friday, September 28, 2012

Explain how the witch-hunt years were a time of "general revenge."

Revenge was certainly a chief motive for the witch hunt. The years leading up to the witch hunt were ripe with feuds (notice how Proctor and Parris dislike each other - since Parris arrived Proctor has all but ceased attending church, mainly because Parris is greedy and worried about possessions rather than a religion), disputes (recall how Putnam accuses Proctor of taking wood from his land. Giles, though, steps in and reminds him how his grandfather had a habit of willing land that he did not own), and old resentments (recall how Putnam is angry that his man for minister did not get selected or how Tituba holds a grudge against Parris for capturing and enslaving her during his time in the Barbados).



All of these factors are building up in the community. Then throw in the strict Puritan religious code where children are to be silent and near invisible, where you have the 'elect' (those who are predestined for heaven) and everyone else and you have the scenario that leads to the mass hysteria and general revenge of the witch hunt.



Note, however, that the witch-hunt years aren't devoted just to getting revenge. The girls begin to like the attention and power they gain from the trials. This becomes a factor for how long the trials go on. Really until Abigail oversteps her authority by implying that Judge Danforth is not out of the devil's reach, she was pretty much allowed to accuse at free will.

Why did Jem not want Scout to tell Atticus about Bob Ewell's comment? Was this a wise thing to ask her to do?This answer will be found in chapter 25.

When Bob Ewell reacts to Tom's death by saying "one down, two more to go," Jem realizes that Ewell's anger has not subsided.  He knows how courageous his father is, but Jem also suspects that Atticus is naive about how deep the feeling for revenge can run.  Jem feels that if Scout tells Atticus about the comment, Atticus might attempt to follow up with the threat and get himself into trouble.

From the standpoint of a 12 year old boy, this is an understandable thing to do.  From the perspective of hindsight, however, it proved foolish.  By telling Atticus, the extent of Ewell's rage might have been realized, and the events of Halloween prevented.

I have to write some poems in the language and writing style of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Where should I start?

I would also recommend using an existing sonnet as a template. With my students, I have them write a sonnet in the style of Sonnet 130. Because it starts off so seemingly insulting, my students seem better able to sink their ink into the task.

I have them follow the form and style, and try for iambic pentameter. If that's too hard, just count out ten beats a line. Then use a similar rhyme scheme (this one is ababcdcdefefgg). The main point is in the rhyming couplet at the end, and it is a reversal of the original point--she may not meet any of the conventions of beauty, but she's rare and she's real.

SONNET #130 By William Shakespeare My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun;
Coral is far more red than her lips' red;
If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;
If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head.
I have seen roses demasked, red and white,
But no such roses see I in her cheeks;
And in some perfumes is there more delight
Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks.
I love to hear her speak, yet well I know
That music hath a far more pleasing sound;
I grant I never saw a goddess go;
My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground.
      And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
      As any she belied with false compare.

1609

 You can keep them theme the same and change the comparisons but keep much of the original structure. Be creative and have fun.

What are examples of symbolism in "The Fall of the House of Usher"?

You can actually start with the title of the story, which alludes to the absolute chaos that lurks within the mansion. This "broken" house is "falling" in every way. Genetically speaking, the Ushers clearly sound like they are the product of generations of inbreeding, or else generations of careless mating. They are a sickly clan, vulnerable, and weak. 



He suffered much from a morbid acuteness of the senses; the most insipid food was alone endurable; he could wear only garments of certain texture; the odours of all flowers were oppressive; his eyes were tortured by even a faint light; and there were but peculiar sounds, and these from stringed instruments, which did not inspire him with horror. 



The Ushers' penchant for isolation also places them in a somewhat supernatural realm where they exist with the world, but not "in" the same world as everyone. It is as if "the house of Usher" is the only niche where they can actually exist...and now, it can no longer resist it: it is falling apart. 


The house, as well as its resident, is described:



with an utter depression of soul which I can compare to no earthly sensation more properly than to the after-dream of the reveller upon opium--the bitter lapse into everyday life--the hideous dropping off of the veil



All of this is symbolic of the mental, spiritual, and physical state of this rare family, which (as it is debated) could even represent a fragment of the narrator's own state of mind. As "a house", the "house of Usher" really encompasses the entire generation of Ushers. They are a dying race; they are disappearing and the house is falling from its foundation. 

How does one write an essay on character?

You should be able to write a great essay on character if
you try to focus on a few attributes or conditions of why and how the character behaves
in a certain way. A common problem in most student essays about character is that
emphasis is placed not on what characters are like but rather on what they do.
Therefore, the most significant element, no matter what approach you might select, how
they think, what they feel, what others think of the character, etc., is that actions,
comments, and speeches from the character should be introduced only to reveal qualities
of the character being studied. The story materials should never become an end in
themselves, never a retelling of the story.  Whenever it is possible in an essay to
perceive a "change" or "growth" of character, the best essay will be written. Thus an
essay on a character could be organized to reflect the changes in her or his behavior,
appearance, or demeanor. You should be able to write an essay in no time at
all.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Cotton is frequently used as a material in clothing? What is special about cotton that makes it so comfortable to wear?Yes, I don't get it. Help...

To begin with, it is important to understand that cotton
is available in a wide range of qualities, and not all of these are equally
comfortable.


The main factors contribute to the difference
in comfort of clothes made from cotton and synthetic fibres. These are the diameter of
the fibre, finish of the fibre surface, and the material of which fibre is made of. In
general the synthetic fibres have bigger diameter as compared to cotton fibres. However
now it is possible to make synthetic fibre, called microfibers, of very low diameters,
These fibres are now used to make fabrics which are very comfortable to wear in terms of
ability to absorb moisture and the ability to breathe.


The
surface finish of the fibre affects the feel of the fabric made out of it. Synthetic
fibres are now subjected to a process called texturising, to improve their surface
finish, or texture. Thus the comfort of synthetic fibre clothing will also depend on the
nature of finish given in the process of texturising.


The
material of fibre determine the basic chemical and physical properties of the fibre. It
has been found that because of these difference, material of synthetic fibre causes
discomfort. Some people are also allergic to the material of synthetic
fibre.

Is there any foreshadowing that points out the surprise ending?

Early descriptions that characterize the protagonist also prepare us for the fact that she will be overcome by joy at her husband's death.  For example, "she does not react" to the news as other wives might. And then the narrator says, "She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength." Both "repression" and "strength," together with this "thing" arousing inside of her, prepare us for the joy she is about to experience.  Her "strength" proves ironic, for it is that aspect of her character--her extraordinary sense of freedom--that ultimately kills her.  Chopin often has her heroines die at the end of her stories, unable for one reason or another to "fit in" with ideologies of womanhood. For Chopin, "strength" in a  woman dooms her.  She wrote this at the turn of the 19-20th centuries.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

What is the difference between a relative max. or min. and an absolute maximum or minimum value?

An extreme point of a function is calculated in this
way:


 - first, differentiate the expression of the
function;


 - after that, solve the equation of the
differentiated function.


In the point where the first
derivative is cancelling, the function has a minimum or maximum
point.


We know that maximum or minimum points could be
either relative, or absolute. The relative maximum or minimum is also called the local
maximum or minimum. That means that the tangent to the graph of function in the point
where the first derivative is cancelling, is horizontal but is not the highest or lowest
value of the function.


An absolute maximum or minimum is
the point where the tangent is horizontal and there is no other value of the function
higer or lower than this one.


Note that the relative
maximum or minimum could be an absolute maximum or minimum.

Monday, September 24, 2012

in Chapter 27:Describe the actions of Bob Ewell. What was he up to and what was motivating him?

Last sentence in the chapter:  "Mr. Bob Ewell stopped Atticus on the post office corner, spat in his face, and told him he'd get him if it took the rest of his life."  Spitting in the face is an insult; it was meant to show Ewell's contempt for him. From Ewell's point of view, Atticus insulted him but implying Ewell, not Tom, assaulted Mayella.  The subsequent threat proves true at the end of the novel when Ewell attacks Scout and Jem while walking home in the dark.

Hobbes, Locke, and the Social Contract:Explain what Hobbes and Locke meant by a social contract. Why did Hobbes think people would choose to enter...

Social contract refers to collection of ideas that support
the theory that people voluntarily give up some of their natural freedoms to some
central governing or regulating authority to reap the benefits of collective and
cooperative living. The benefit result from maintenance of social order based on rule of
law. One important premise of the social contract theories is that that the government
or any other authority derives power to rule from the consent of those
governed.


Three of the earliest and very important
contributor to the concept of social contract are Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke
(1632-1724), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778).


Hobbes
believed people choose to enter into social contracts voluntarily giving up some of
their natural freedom to protect themselves from the chaos of what Hobbes called "war of
all against all" that will develop in absence of rule of
law.


Locke's concept of social contract envisaged the
creation of a neutral judge that could protect the life liberty and property of those
living within the system of social contract. This concept differs from that of Hobbes
primarily in the degree of to which people need to be restrained by the social
contract.


More details of concept of social contract are
available on the web page referred.

Who is the unnamed narrator in “A Rose for Emily”and for whom does he profess to be speaking?

The narrator in "A Rose for Emily" is definitely a
townsperson, or the townspeople
themselves. 


The narrator tells the story from the point of
view that the townspeople would have had when originally witnessing the events that are
told about.  Notice that nothing is mentioned that wouldn't have been seen or heard or
smelled by the townspeople. 


When Emily buys poison, we get
the details from the point of view of the pharmacist.  When the house smells, we get the
story from the point of view of the people that smelled the stink, and from the people
that put down the lime.  When town leaders go to Emily to collect taxes, we get the
version of the events from the point of view of the people that
went.  


Since townspeople never went upstairs to the
bedroom where the skeleton was kept, we don't get that detail until they finally do go
in the bedroom--after Emily's death.   


I don't know that
there is much disagreement about the narrator.  From what I've read, the only
disagreement that exists today is whether the narrator is a single person from the town,
or the collective voice of the town itself.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

I really need help with writing a poem!?My poem have to include a simile and personification. Here is my poem: (please fix my mistake and add some...

I wake up in the calming
silence,


Feeling warmth upon my
skin,



Hummingbirds flutter with all their
might,


Through the lattice spread of
leaves,


Like blossoms popping in and
out,


A colorful illusion in the
moment,



I peer into the deep blue of the
sky,


Letting the world go
by,



I say enough of the hustle and
bustle,


The morning has just
begun,


She calls to all to wake and
rise,


Making me  delete every
care,




Summer
mornings,


My favorite,


Feeding
my understandings,


Searing deep within my
soul.



I really liked your poem.  I did a little
rearranging of the words and some editing, but not much.  The feelings are there and you
were able to help me to visualize the summer morning.  I like the way that you painted a
picture.

In Chapter 5, what is the paradox of the boys' attitude toward the beast?

Golding blends irony with paradox so effectively that it becomes difficult to distinguish one from the other. A paradox is a statement that appears to be contradictory or impossible but expresses a striking truth.  Irony—in this case structural—refers to an implication of a reversed meaning that we might not appreciate the irony until we finish reading the entire piece. It is paradoxical that something that doesn’t exist could frighten someone, because logic would suggest that we must be frightened about something. The greater truth here, however, is that people are frightened more about what they don’t know than what they do know, and it is this fear of the unknown that terrifies the children. Golding ultimately locates this fear inside the children, which we especially see when Simon encounters the Lord of the Flies. Piggy’s insistence that beasts don’t exist because if they did “things wouldn’t make sense…they wouldn’t work,” which is his way of dismissing the “unknown” turns out to be ironically true, for as “civilization” breaks down on the island things don’t make sense and tragic actions that are not intended occur.

Discuss the element of superstition in the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar?

Many superstitions of the Elizabethan Age date back to
much earlier times, including the Age of the Roman Empire.  Thus, the inclusion of omens
and dreams in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is
of great significance both to the audience and to the play itself.  Throughout the play,
there are soothsayers, dreams, ghosts, and personal interpretations of the stars that
greatly affect the characters.


Caesar, of course, ignores
all supernatural warnings and signs for fear that the Roman people think him weak.  He
refuses to listen to the soothsayer who cautions him against the Ides of March; he
ignores his wife's entreaties to not attend the Senate because she has had a most
portentous dream.  The storm of the previous night moves him not.  All these signs he
ignores lest his role as leader be questioned; yet, ironically, he is easily swayed by
Decius's interpretations of these omens and dreams that he should, indeed, go to the
Senate.


And, it is this vacillation between disbelief and
belief that threads the play Julius Caesar.  For instance, in "the
seduction scene" of Act I, Cassius tells Brutus,


readability="13">

The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our
stars,


But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
I,ii,140-141)



But later, in
Act V, he tells Messala that he once "held Epicurus strong," meaning he does not
believe, as Epicurus did, that the gods interest themselves in men's affairs.  but, now,
Brutus says, "...I change my mind" (V,i,78-79). Cassius tells Messala of an omen that
presaged death.


Likewise, Brutus vacillates between belief
and disbelief in omens and other superstitions. For, in Act I, he is convinced by
Cassius's statement that destiny lies in the hands of each man.  Later, he ignores the
portents of the suicide of his wife Portia; however, he talks to Cassius of destiny
regarding their forthcoming battle in Philippi:


readability="24">

There is a tide in the affairs of
men


Which, taken at the flood, leads on to
fortune;


Omitted, all the voyage of their
life


Is bound in shallows and in
miseries.


On such a full sea are we now
afloat,


And we must take the current when it
serves,


Or lose our ventures. (IV,iii,
244-250)



And, directly after
this speech, Brutus encounters the ghost of Caesar, telling
it,



That
mak'st my blood cold, and my hair to stare?


Speak to me
what thou art. ...


Ill spirit, I would hold more talk with
thee. (IV,iii,315-317)



But
when Cassius tells Brutus that "the affairs of men rests still incertain" after having
witnessed the omen of the eagles, Brutus rejects such ideas
saying,



But I
do find it cowardly and vile,


For fear of what might fall,
so to prevent


The time of life, arming myself with
patience


To stay the providence of some high
powers


That govern us below.
(V,iii,112-116)



These words,
indeed, echo those of Caesar before he goes to the Senate.  Is it, then, the ghost of
Caesar which has made Brutus say these words--"thy [Brutus's] evil spirit"--or
himself?


Certainly, from the opening festival of Lupercal
in which infertile women hope to change their condition during this superstitious
holiday, to the words of the soothsayer that presage the tragedy of Julius Caesar,
superstition, along with its acceptance and rejection, is a powerful force in
Shakespeare's classic play. But, perhaps like modern man, the Romans manipulated their
superstitions to fit their own inner desires, fears, and motives, underscoring the
statement of William Jennings Bryant:


readability="7">

Destiny is not a matter of chance, but of choice.
It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be
achieved.



And, so it is true,
as Cassius says, that "the fault is not in the stars, but in
ourselves."

Saturday, September 22, 2012

In The Great Gatsby, what is the significance of Jordan's lies?

In some ways similar to the inconsistency and tendency to
use other people, Jordan's dishonesty only serves to heighten the impression of her
worldview based entirely on what she feels is good for her or what she wants at the
moment.  She is meant to be seen as amoral and selfish and her lying to Nick and to
others helps to strengthen that impression.


In some ways it
also connects to the fact that basically everything about her is false, both her words
as well as her actions and the act she puts on for the world.

Friday, September 21, 2012

what thematically related insights do scout and dill receive outside the courtroom? |Chapter 20

In terms of prejudice and tolerance, when Scout and Dill realize that Mr. Raymond isn't really the town drunk (drinking Coca Cola instead), they are shown a new insight into his character.  They realize that he is giving the white community the impression he is a drunk because then they will make life so difficult because he prefers to live with African Americans.  Indeed he has several bi-racial children.  He advises them to not cry over the trial but to cry over the evil people practice upon each other - regardless of race - each and every day.  Once we can conquer that evil, then we won't have to worry about racism and intolerance.

This little scene also ties into the role of innocence and experience.  There are several examples in the book where Scout has her innocent world view challenged, such as when she sees Atticus shoot the rabid dog, when she sees how Calphurnia acts differently at the black church, when she sees Miss Maudie's attitude after her house has burned down, when she feels sorry of Mayella Ewell during her testimony.  This is just another moment in their lives where they realize that the people are not always what they appear to be.

What is the rhyming and metric structure of Robert Frost's poem, "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening?"

"Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening," is one of Robert
Frost's best known and best loved short poems. The simple narrative of a wintertime
traveler on horseback who stops for a moment to watch snow fall in his neighbour's dusky
woods has entranced readers for generations. A large part of that pleasure has to be in
the unique - for poetry written in English - rhyming and metric structure on which the
poet builds his recollected scenes. It is the usual practice in a poem constructed of
four line stanzas of four feet (a quatrain) to rhyme the first with the third line and
the second with the fourth. Even that much rhyme in English poems (the language being
generally poor in rhymes) was too much for many poets; many of the ancient balladeers,
for example, ceased their labours after rhyming the first and third lines. However,
Frost who once defined freedom (poetic as well as moral) as "moving easy in
harness," decided to write quatrains of three rhymes (aaba). Then, as if engaged in some
kind of New England-style dare, set himself the truly herculean task of picking up the
'odd' rhyme in the following quatrain: Thus: bbcb and ccdc. Having set himself this
difficult task, Frost was faced with having to 'tie up' the rhyming loose end in the
final quatrain. He might have elected purely mathematical symmetry by rhyming the final
'odd' line with the dominant rhyme of the first quatrain, and thus confusing the reader
with an anomalous rhyme. Instead, in a compositional act that can only be described as
inspired, Frost repeated the penultimate line and rhyme of the
poem. Working brilliantly within this self-imposed structure, Frost elucidated the deep
meaning of the poem concealed behind its simple story.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Why does Bradbury refer to Ortega Gasset in his book Fahrenheit 451? What is implied about Gasset's philosophy?


The
characteristic of the hour is that the commonplace mind, knowing itself to be
commonplace, has the assurance to proclaim the rights of the commonplace and to impose
them wherever it will.



As
they say in the United States: "to be different is to be indecent." The mass crushes
beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual,
qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like
everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated.


- This quote
is from Gassett's "Revolt of the Masses." Gassett was a liberal humanist philosopher. 
He wrote about the superior man and the "mass man."  The mass man simply was content
with who he was, the circumstances he was born into.  The mass man doesn't really think
about the future.  He just lets society and the masses push him along as he passively
listens to authority.  The superior man thinks about history and the future. If the
"masses" were to revolt, they would need to do do individually.  Gassett's philosophy
was existentialist in a sense: the individual must take responsibility for his/herself
and for his/her future society.  Mentioning Gassett as one of Simmons' specialty was
purposeful. Montag was a "mass man" and through Clarisse, Faber and notably, his own
curiosity, became an individual thinker.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Child labor during the industrial revolution, how did it affect the people & societies of that time?Im doing a history project on child labor...

I agree with the first answer.  But I would add one
thing.


The first answer says we have to remember that those
days were not like today and so we must not hold them to our values.  But we also have
to compare those days to what came before.


It is true that
kids had always been expected to work.  But before the Industrial Revolution, that work
had always happened at home, within the context of the family's work (farming, mostly,
but other things too).


Once industrialization came, the
kids were expected to work, but now they were working away from their family and under
the supervision of strangers.


This put stress on the
families because it was a very different social situation than had existed
before.

act II. Scene III. how does the night described by Lennox compare with the night as experienced by Macbeth in the previous scene?Also, how can I...

Lennox described a violent storm that had occurred earlier the night of Duncan's murder.  In the previous scene, Macbeth heard, while committing the murder of Duncan, voices saying that Macbeth had "murdered sleep" and "Macbeth shall sleep no more" among other things.  It's fitting that the night of the murder was unruly (the old man in the last scene of Act 2 describes a night of very strange events) because it was the night that a king was killed.  King James I, the king of England when Macbeth was written, believed that he was divinely chosen to be king after a plot to assassinate him was thwarted.  Since it was God's plan that he be king, any disruption of that plan such as murder, should result in a disruption in the natural ways of nature.  Shakespeare wanted to flatter James I, so when the king in the play is killed, the result is that wild night of strange weather and odd events.

In scene 2 of Act 2, Macbeth has just killed Duncan and he is in a stunned state.  He shows remorse when he looks at his bloody hands, when he can't go back into Duncan's room and look at him, and when he says that he wishes the knocking at the gate could waken Duncan.  In scene 3, Macbeth shows cunning when he quickly kills the guards and then declares that his rage over their crime caused him to do so.  His desire to get away with his crime overruns his remorse.

Monday, September 17, 2012

where can i find teen parenting articles in the internet?

There are all kinds of resources available for teen
parents including those that are actually written by other teen parents describing their
experiences and problems or solutions they have
found.


There are also loads of different articles and
websites from every perspective imaginable about teen pregnancy, teen parenting,
statistics about teens who become or are likely to become parents, etc.  Just google
"teen parenting" and see the myriad results that come
up.


There are also articles and websites about trying to
manage the relationship between a teen parent and their own parents and some of the
conflicts that can arise in that situation.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

I need more unusual but well-sourced forms of revenge I could add to my essay about Wuthering Heights.I'm trying to write a ten-page paper on...

Are you looking for some other literature with which to
compare the theme of revenge? I am not sure if this is what you are asking, but if so,
what about the theme of revenge in The Count of Monte Cristo? In
this novel, Dantes learns in the end that revenge is destructive and that forgiveness is
redemptive. Heathcliff does not learn to forgive, and it destroys him. This is perhaps
why he is haunted by Catherine's ghost. Maybe you have already used this with regard to
your theme of revenge.


Are you looking for other works that
use ghosts as messengers? Ghosts are often symbolic ways in literature of sending a
message to the living. Think about the ghost in A Christmas Carol.
In this story, Scrooge learns, from Marley's ghost, that he needs to change
his ways. The ghost is sent as a warning. You could also use the ghost of Hamlet's
father. In this play, the ghost wants Hamlet to seek revenge for his murder. There are
also a lot of short stories that feature ghosts or people rising from the dead (or
people imagining that they are seeing ghosts) - The Fall of the House of
Usher
comes to mind, or The Tell-Tale Heart. Also, what
about Macbeth and Banquo's ghost? If you want something more modern, in The
Lovely Bones,
the murdered girl, Susie Salmon, is looking down from heaven,
trying to get people to figure out who killed her. Some characters in the story "sense"
her spectral presence, although she isn't really a true ghost. Nevertheless, she is
seeking that her murder be solved and in a sense, vengeance -- although it is more like
justice.


If this is not what you are asking, please re-post
so that we can help you further.


If you give
us

In Julius Caesar, what was the purpose of having the two soldiers come and sleep in Brutus’ tent?

Brutus tells Varro and Claudius that he wants them to sleep in his tent because he may have to wake them to take a message to Cassius. I think that Shakespeare also has them there so that Brutus was not alone when the ghost of Caesar comes to him. After the appearance of the ghost, Brutus wakes both Varro and Claudius but although Lucius spoke in his sleep, neither of them heard anything of the ghost. Thus the only other potential witnesses to the ghostly visitation saw and heard nothing, calling into question the veracity of the visitation. Did Caesar truly return, or was the ghost a figment of Brutus' guilty conscience?

what threetricks does rainsford use to elude Zaroff?

Aside from the initial doubling back several times to confuse the path and then hiding in a tree (an attempt that does not work because Zaroff is just playing with Rainsford), Rainsford develops three traps to escape Zaroff.  First, Rainsford rigs a trap that when Zaroff trips it, a dead tree will fall on the latter.  When that does not work, Rainsford then digs a pit with sharp sticks in the Death Swamp, and covers the opening with branches and weeds.  The second trap fails as well, killing only one of Zaroff's dogs, so Rainsford attempts a third method:  he affixes a knife to a sapling, to cut Zaroff when he follows the path.  However this fails as well, killing Ivan instead of Zaroff.  Yet, Zaroff manages to avoid all three tricks.

What effect does the contrasedative have on Mildred in Farhenheit 451?

The contrasedative is given to Mildred by two "handymen" who arrived to revive her from her suicide attempt. Montag is worried, but the men assure him that these things happen nine or ten times a night and not to worry. On their way out the men say that they have given her a contrasedative and that she will wake up hungry. A contrasedative has the opposite effect of a sedative- this will revive someone and give them energy, whereas a sedative will put a person to sleepw. Mildred wakes up with color in her cheeks and no recollection of her suicide attempt. 

Could someone tell me something on the topic "The romantic concern with creation" in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.

Scientists in the Romantic era (late 1700s and early
1800s) were all looking to turn lead into gold.  The study of
alchemy was devoted to this chemical process, and it
consumed the attentions of the public and academic communities alike.  Today, it sounds
like a get-rich-quick scheme, but then it seemed feasible.  It was a kind of Midas
touch.  Or like trying to discover the Fountain of
Youth.


So, this process crossed over into the biological
sciences.  The quest became trying to find the secret to everlasting life or how to
re-animate life from death.  It had been done with insects and small animals, I think,
and so scientists and authors played with the idea of doing it with humans.  As you
know, this idea has become a reality today with human and animal cloning and genetic
engineering.


In terms of literature, there was a resurgence
in classicism.  Many Romantic authors and poets fell in love with ancient Greek and
Roman mythology, much of which were concerned with the creations of the earth, human
life, and fire.  The subtitle for Frankenstein, in fact, is
The Modern Prometheus.  Prometheus is the god who gave mankind the
secret of fire and was forever punished by Zeus for it.  So, Mary Shelley creates a new
work of art from an ancient mythical concept.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

describe what happens during the banquet that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth have after Macbeth becomes king

Macbeth discovers Banquo's ghost and talks with him. Of course, the guests cannot see him. Lady Macbeth assures the guests that he has had these spells since his childhood. She attempts to control him, and host his guests but is unsuccessful. Finally, she asks the guests to leave so that he can rest.

In the play "Hamlet", how is Laertes more admirable than Hamlet? In what scenes is this most apparent?

Laertes is decisive, confident, and a strong leader.  Hamlet is indecisive, self-conscious, and unable to lead.  Hamlet wavers - he wants revenge desparately, but he is too scared to follow through.  This is seen in the "To Be or Not to Be" speech in Act III, scene i, where Hamlet specifically mentions his fear of taking action.  Also, in Act III, scene iii, Hamlet has a clear chance to kill Claudius when Claudius is alone, but he is unable to.   

After Polonius' death, however, Laertes barges in ready to take action.  He challenges Claudius to his face, rather than trying to trap him in a confession like Hamlet does, and then challenges Hamlet to his face.  In all his actions, Laertes is more upfront.  He is a good leader in Act I, scene iii, when he shows responsibility in his speech to Ophelia, cautioning her with specifics and calling upon her duty to follow his direction.

Laertes is a steadier character overall, and this gives him an edge over Hamlet.

Whom does Daisy love? Is she capable of loving anyone? Why?When Tom and Gatsby engage in an argument and confront each other, they make Daisy...

I see the issues involved in answering your questions a
little differently.  I don't think how Gatsby made his money has anything to do with
Daisy's ultimate rejection of him.  It may be a bit of a stumbling block, but it's not
that much of a problem.  I don't think Daisy cares how Gatsby made his money.  It's too
far removed from her.  She cares about maintaining the status quo, and about
respectability, to a certain extent.  But the issue isn't
major. 


I give Daisy more credit that some commentators
do.  I believe the reason she rejects Gatsby is because she does have a sense of
ethics.  Not in terms of how Gatsby makes his money--again, that's too far removed.  She
accepts that just as most readers do--look how famous Al Capone is.  On the surface,
bootlegging is often thought of as a victimless crime.  The government was the foolish
force behind prohibition, and therefore bootlegging.  The government was in error. 
Haven't we allowed alcohol production and sales ever
since?


Daisy's sense of ethics comes into play because, as
she herself says, Gatsby asks too much.  Gatsby insists that Daisy pronounce that she
never ever loved Tom; that she always loved Gatsby.  That's how Gatsby loved her.  And
he insists that Daisy recipricate, that she say that she loved Gatsby the way Gatsby
loved her.  And Daisy refuses to do that. 


She does it at
first.  Her initial reaction is to agree with Gatsby.  She is upset with Tom and knows
he's been having an affair.  (And please note that this is after Tom accuses Gatsby of
bootlegging.)  But the second Tom shows a little tenderness, and reminds her of some of
the tender moments they've had together, she recants and tells Gatsby that he asks too
much, and sides with Tom.  She refuses to perjure herself.  She did love Tom once, and
she refuses to say otherwise. 


She refuses to take part in
Gatsby's illusion.  He idealizes their past relationship and his illusion is dependent
upon Daisy loving him as much as he loved her.  And that just isn't
true. 


Think of it this way:  Gatsby has as much money, or
even more money, than Tom does.  Who has the nicer shirts?  If money were the issue,
Daisy would side with Gatsby.  But money isn't the issue.  Daisy sides with Tom because
Gatsby asks too much.


Finally, does Daisy love her
daughter?  We don't really know.  All we know is that Daisy feels sorry for her
daughter, because her daughter is a female born into a male-dominated world.  She will
face the same crummy situation that Daisy faced:  her only chance for social and
economic improvement is to be a pretty, little fool, and marry a wealthy
man.  

In chapter thirteen of Grapes of Wrath, what is Tom's ironic comment about the government?

After Grampa dies, the family realizes that they do not have the money to give him a proper burial.  Much as they dislike the idea, they have no other option that to bury him along the road on their own.  Tom points out that workers might accidentally dig Grampa up and think he was a murder victim.  He notes ironically, "The gov'ment's got more interest in a dead man than a live one.  They'll go hell-scrapin' tryin' to find out who he was and how he died" (Chapter 13).  He suggests burying Grampa with a note telling who he was and how he died.

Tom's comment ties directly into the theme of the novel.  The same government that will expend huge resources trying to bring the killer of an assumed murder victim to justice does nothing to help that victim while he is alive, along with untold thousands of others, while they are desperately seeking means to sustain themselves and their families.

What final statement by Jem makes Scout finally go along with the plan to peek in the windows of the Boo Radley's in chapter 6?

Jem says, "Scout, I'm tellin' you for the last time, shut your trap or go home--I declare to the Lord you're gettin' more like a girl every day!"

Jem and Dill were Scout's only real "summer" friends, and they were both boys, so she needed to keep up.  At this point in the story, Scout doesn't think there is much good in being a female.  Later in the story, observation and interaction with Calpurnia open her eyes to the fact that there is "some skill" necessary to be a girl.

What is the role of Feste in "Twelfth Night"?

Many of Shakespeare's plays have a fool or jester as a
character.  This play is one of them and Feste is the character who playst that
role.


Feste's role seems to have two parts.  First, he is a
clown -- one who keeps things funny.  You can see from his name that part of his job is
to do this.  His name is connected to "festival" and shows that he is supposed to cause
there to be fun and celebration.


But he is also supposed to
play a role as a wise man, and some say he is the wisest person in the play.  His jokes
often have a real point to them and they help people to see things more
clearly.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Does the house really whisper and why only the children and the toy hear thr whisper?

The story is written in a fairy tale or fable style.  Just look at the first paragraph where we are introduced to the characters and conflict.  If you view it as a modern day fairy tale, which magical elements, then the house could certainly whisper to the kids. 

One reason the children are only able to hear it is because the mother is oblivious to their needs and the house's needs.  She is living beyond her means, so there is always a need for money.  However, she does little about it.  When Paul is able to earn money for her, she doesn't save it.  Instead she burns through it, causing the house to call louder than ever for more money. 

The fact, that her mother cannot hear the whispers is one reason Paul is driven to ride the rocking horse in order to compensate for the money his mother desires and the money his father isn't luck enough to bring in.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Community, Identity, Stability -- How is each one achieved in BNW?

The world is a monolithic
community.  There is one World
State
, run by a Controller.  There are no separate nations; all have been
amalgamated into one.  This world state controls humans much like a factory manufactures
cars and a cult reaps converts: through mass production and pleasure mediation.  Yes,
there is an outcaste state, the Savage Reservation in New Mexico, but they don't
count.


Identity is defined by
the caste system.  All the castes are genetically
engineered according to a mold.  Everyone is a clone in uniform.  Mottos and mass media
and conditioning are all done to teach each caste member to hate books and nature, love
the state, and do his intended task without
question.


Stability is
achieved by the genetic engineering and birth
/ population control
: the "Bokanovsky
Process
. This causes the fertilized egg to bud and create up to 96
identical individuals who will be trained to do identical jobs."
 This pyramid social
strata creates the social hierarchy, as there is a large, mindless work force supporting
the few, intelligent elite.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Cite one example of explicit language and one of implicit language in "The Most Dangerous Game."

To state something explicitly, one goes directly to the point, whereas if one speaks implicitly, innuendos are employed, meanings are not directly expressed and are, therefore, open to interpretation. Intriguingly, the title of Connell's story has both explicit and implicit meanings: Explicitly, it means a sport or activity which involves great opportunities for harm to a person; implicitly, it can mean a creature that is hunted who possesses an intelligence which makes it a serious threat.


In "The Most Dangerous Game," there are certainly instances in which both explicit and implicit language are used by the characters. For instance, in his dinner conversation with Rainsford, General Zaroff employs both explicit and implicit language:


     Zaroff explains to Rainsford that he is familiar with him because he has read all Rainsford's books on hunting published in three different languages. Then, he says explicitly, "I have but one passion in my life, Mr. Rainsford, and it is the hunt."


Rainsford observes one of Zaroff's "wonderful heads" and remarks explicitly, "I've always thought...that the Cape buffalo is the most dangerous of all big game." To this remark, Zaroff replies implicitly, 



"Here in my preserve on this island," he replied in the same slow tone, " I hunt more dangerous game." (implicit language--he implies a meaning other than what Rainsford considers)
Rainsford expressed his surprise. "Is there big game on this island?" (explicit language)
The general nodded. "The biggest." (implicit language--the general is not speaking of size; he implies the intelligence level.)



Their conversation continues in this manner, until Rainsford finally grasps the implied meanings of Zaroff's remarks and is horrified at the realization that the general has been implying that he hunts men.



"But you can't mean---gasped Rainsford."    (explicit language)
"And why not?....I am speaking of hunting." (very implicit language)
"Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder." (very explicit language)


What are some of the figures of speech in The Gift of the Magi?

It would be difficult to list them all in a single answer because this story is full of them, but here are a couple more examples. 

O Henry uses in allusion in refering to the riches of King Solomon (this is also humor as O Henry chooses to make King Solomon a janitor during this reference!)

Jim is similed to a hunting dog in the line, "Jim stopped inside the door, as immovable as a sett at the scent of quail."

And of course, the big one, lots of irony in this story.  Della sells her hair for the watch chain, and Jim sells his watch for the set of combs.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Explain the importance of the quote youre not wanted we are going to have fun on this island so dont try it on my poor misguided boy or else

In a more symbolic sense, the pig's head represents evil
incarnate, temptation.  We know that from Golding's notes on the novel in which he
equates "Lord of the Flies" to Beelzebub. On the other hand Simon has striking
similarities to Jesus.  He is kind, compassionate, intuitive, prophetic, and messianic.
 The pig's head acts as his tempter, equivalent to Satan's temptation of Jesus in the
wilderness.  What Simon is being asked to do is "have fun on the island."  This phrase
is most often used by Jack, and to him "having fun" means hunting and killing.  Almost
every other boy on the island with the exception of Piggy enjoys the savage nature of
the hunt.  Even Ralph enjoys participating in the boar hunt, and later engages in the
pig-hunt reenactment, which almost goes too far--Robert acting as the pig is almost hurt
by the boys surrounding him.


Simon is asked to join in the
fun or savagery.  In order to survive on the island, he must change.  The consequence
for remaining civilized is death.  As the pig's head tells Simon, the boys "will do him"
if he does not "play."


It is not Simon's nature to change,
to become savage, to hurt, or to kill, and he resist this temptation by falling into a
fit.  When he comes to, he goes to tell the boys the true nature of the beast. This
action leads to the fulfillment of the pig's head's prophecy.  The boys do indeed "do
him."

In Alberta when released from prison it's required that they give you a handgun with bullets. why is this a law?, has it caused any...

If this was indeed implemented, it would have to have been
around two centuries ago, when horse and gun were the most effective methods of
transportation and defense, respectively. Looks like this was a purely provincial law,
not necessarily a country-wide thing going on in Canada.


As
with other provincial laws, they are unique to a smaller population with perhaps a
social circumstance so diverse and separate from the rest of the country that special
and somewhat odd allocations and concessions might be permissible. In the case of the
gun and the horse, it is basically (like the previous post inferred) that the person is
given the chance to go far away, and the gun would protect them in the
wilderness.


I am almost positive that if this is an
anachronistic rule that is still in place for being overlooked, it still does not mean
that it is being practiced today.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, what is Aunt Alexandra's attitude toward Bob Ewell, Tom Robinson and the trial? And what does she like to...

Since Atticus is her brother, Alexandra tends to support
him because he is family--and the Finch name has always been of the utmost importance to
her. If we can believe Scout's cousin, Francis, then we know that Alexandra cares little
for Negroes.


readability="7">

"Grandma (Alexandra) says its bad enough he
(Atticus) lets you all run wild, but now he's turned out to be a
nigger-lover..."



We know that
Alexandra was not happy with Atticus defending Tom, since Scout later overheard her
arguing with her father.


readability="5">

"She won't let him alone about Tom Robinson. She
almost said Atticus was disgracin' the
family."



Alexandra refused to
attend the trial, but she did seem sincerely disappointed that Atticus had suffered
defeat. Alexandra seems to have mellowed even more when she hears of Tom's death. But it
is her brother that she is most concerned about, not
Tom.



   "I
can't say I approve of everything he does, Maudie, but he's my brother, and I just want
to know when this will ever end... It tears him to
pieces."



Alexandra never
speaks much about Bob Ewell, but since she despises the Cunningham clan, we can only
assume that she must feel likewise about the Ewells. She does warn Atticus about Bob's
persistence, however.


readability="5">

"His kind'd do anything to pay off a grudge. You
know how those people
are."



Perhaps Alexandra's
most telling opinion of Bob was one that was never uttered. In Chapter 27, she had a
premonition.


readability="13">

... she stopped short in the middle of her
sentence. She closed her mouth, then opened it to say something, but no words
came.
    " 's matter, Auntie?" I asked.
    "Oh nothing, nothing,"
she said, "someone just walked over my
grave."



After the children
were attacked, Alexandra realized what her unexplained feeling had meant, and she blamed
herself for not understanding the implications of it.


As
for Alexandra's hobbies, she likes to socialize with other Maycomb women of high
standing; she enjoys cooking; and she attempts to put her mark on Atticus'
children--escpecially Scout, whom she hopes to somehow make more
ladylike.

In Paulo Coelho's The Alchemist, how old is Santiago when the story begins? How do you know?

In Paulo Coelho's novel The Alchemist, it can often times be misleading in trying to ascertain the age of Santiago for he is often times referred to as "the boy." There are probably several reasons for this. Quite literally in his culture, he may be considered a boy because he has not chosen a "fixed" career and married. He may not have taken on the responsibilities of a grown man in having a plan for his life. He is much like a child still filled with dreams and a desire not to settle down (though as the story progresses, he isexperiencing the first desires to stay in one place, with a merchant's daughter). For the sake of the novel, he has not yet determined his Personal Legend; at the beginning of the novel, he does not even know there is such a thing. So the sense that he is a boy simply may indicate that in terms of searching out his destiny, Santiago has not yet begun his journey.


As with most stories, we learn about our main characters at the beginning of the novel, where we begin to form our initial impressions. As with many first impressions, these perceptions will remain with the reader and should be "in sync" with what the character does: this is certainly the case with Santiago.


We meet a young "man" who knows what he does not want, and vaguely what he does want: he does not want to join the church as his family would have him do. He does want to travel (and has since he was a small boy), and logically decides that shepherding would provide him with this opportunity. And in keeping with this persona, he comes to love and know his sheep, care for them and appreciate them. He is a good person.


When the story begins, Santiago has found a ruined church, and it is here that we learn that he provides shelter for his sheep and accounts for each one—he will even search the entire next day if one sheep wanders away. (It his here that we see Santiago presented as a Christ-like figure.)


When the boy wakens, we learn several things: he is a "serious" reader, so we can assume that he is relatively smart. He has had "the recurring dream" again, he is aware of an undefined energy that he shares with his sheep and he has been with his sheep for two years.



It was as if some mysterious energy bound his life to that of the sheep, with whom he had spent the past two years...



Again, later, the boy thinks of the two years he has traveled the "Andalusian terrain." And immediately thereafter, he reveals his age:



He was planning, on this visit, to explain to the girl how it was that a simple shepherd knew how to read. That he had attended a seminary until he was sixteen...



So we know he is at least eighteen, though he might be a littleolder.


Ironically, Santiago thinks to himself...



But ever since he had been a child, he had wanted to know the world, and this was much more important to him than knowing God...



As the story progresses—after he meets Melchizedek and crosses the desert to the oasis where he will meet Fatima—he will encounter the alchemist who will boast of Santiago's ability to change himself into the wind, and here Santiago will meet God.


Though he is referred to as a boy, it is only because he has not been tried by the world and found his Personal Legend that he is not considered a man. By the novel's end, this is not the case.

Will somebody please explain to me what is a summary for Chapters 21-22 in Belle Prater's Boy?It doesn't have to be a summary, but just explain...

Woodrow convinces Gypsy to come with him on an adventure;
they will go with Blind Benny on his rounds. Benny shows the children his new shoes,
which the "boys at the hardware" store got him, explaining that the boys are like
family, and that he has Gypsy's parents to thank for that. Benny was born blind, and his
parents died when he was only twelve. To support himself, he became a "sin eater," which
is someone who takes the sins of dead upon himself by eating a banquet placed on the
deceased's casket, so that he or she can "go to...glory clean and free." Benny did this
for fifteen years, and was shunned by the townspeople because of it, until he met
Gypsy's dad, who told him the sin eater concept was "a bunch of ignorant superstitious
nonsense." Gypsy's dad brought Benny with him to Coal Station, Virginia, where he was
opening a hardware store. He gave the blind man a permanent place to stay, enabling him
to start a new life. Benny, Gypsy, and Woodrow sing and tell jokes as Benny gathers
things people have left for him outside their houses, and when they finally return home,
Gypsy realizes the joy that arises when people are good to others. She looks at Benny
and Woodrow through eyes of love, and recongizes that this has been one of the happiest
nights of her life (Chapter 21).


At Granny's birthday
dinner, Woodrow reads an essay defending his belief


readability="8">

"that Blind Benny, even with his poor sightless
eyes, is the only person (he) knows who can see with perfect clarity...because Benny is
able to see beyond
appearances."



Porter proposes
a special toast to Granny, then announces that the towns folks think it is time for
Gypsy to have her own formal piano recital. Although Gypsy is at first stunned, she
feels "a thrill of excitement beginning to grow." Doc Dot then makes a second
announcement, concerning Woodrow. She has a doctor friend in Baltimore, who has agreed
to see if something can be done about Woodrow's eyes; the chances of a successful
operation appear to be promising. Now it is Woodrow's turn to be elated, and Gypsy calls
the party "by far the best one (they) ever had" (Chapter 22).

Saturday, September 8, 2012

How does the American Dream effect Holden's view on gender roles in The Catcher in the Rye?

In The Catcher in the Rye, the
American Dream of the 1950s was reserved mainly, if not exclusively, for males.  All of
Holden's prep school classmates are males--they are the elite who are going to be heads
of industry; all his teachers are males; the headmaster is male.  Holden's father works;
his brother works; his mom stays home; his sister stays home (doesn't go off to prep
school).


There are dozens of females in the novel: the
nuns, Morrow's mother, Jane, the girls in the bar.  None of them work.  They are the
objects of/for men.  Jane and Pheobe are raised to be housewives, domestic servants who
wait hand and foot at home on males, the traditional family breadwinners.  The only
working woman in the novel, ironically, is a girl--Sonny, the prostitute, who is
obviously controlled by a man, Maurice, her pimp.


Holden
fears Jane and Pheobe will fall prey to men as well.  He hates that Stradlater is dating
Jane; he hates that the word "FU*K" is written on the wall for Pheobe to see.  In this
way he wants to be a catcher in the rye: to protect children, namely girls, from sexual
objectification and manipulation.  The thing is, he's not very good at it.  He knows
he's fighting a losing battle.  He knows the average male, like himself, is obsessed
with sex.


So, it is clear: males are meant to be out in the
world, making and spending money; women are passive, domestic objects of male
pre-occupation, namely sex.  In this way, the novel reflects a conservative, sexist
America.  Catcher in the Rye is pre-feminist in its depiction of
gender roles and the American dream: it does not anticipate or call for the sexual
revolution and the blurring of gender roles.

Friday, September 7, 2012

How did the media influence the civil rights movement?

The media influenced the civil rights movement in key
ways, and it is important to understand that the leaders of the movement understood this
fact very clearly. First, the media tended to anoint leaders of the movement,
particularly Martin Luther King. This had the effect of portraying King's vision of the
movement, which was non-violent and essentially political (the media for a time tended
to efface his statements about economic equality) as if it represented a
consensus. 


The other influence the media had on the
movement was to televise its key events to a nationwide, and even worldwide audience.
The entire nation was shocked by the shocking scenes from places like Birmingham and
Selma. Not only did this lead to popular support for civil rights legislation everywhere
but the South, but in a Cold War context, it created a major propaganda opportunity for
the Soviet Union to portray US rhetoric about freedom as hollow and
meaningless.

In Chapter 24 of the Kite Runner, what symbols does the author use?

Sohrab is the most significant symbol in the chapter.  As Hassan's son, he is a symbol of redemption to Amir - by saving the child Amir can alleviate his guilt and pay back a small portion of the debt he owes his friend.  Both Hassan and Sohrab are brutalized by Assef and defend themselves against him with a slingshot and stone, adding another level of symbolism to the symbolic reincarnation of the father in the son - of the Biblical David going up against Goliath. As an abused and molested child, a "wounded little boy", Sohrab may also represent the innocent children of Afghanistan, victimized by "history and religion" in their homeland. 

Other symbols include the television, representing Western influence as well as fulfillment of a promise Amir made to Hassan in Chapter 6, the "fake dusty palm tree...flying pink flamingoes on the wallpaper...Formica...counters" of the hotel lobby, signifying the falseness of Western affluence and modernity, and the pigeons at the Blue Mosque, faithful and trusting, flocking to the peace and safety offered by Islam.  Also, the Les Miserables poster next to the American map at the embassy is a Statue-of-Liberty-like representation of America as a refuge for the downtrodden, Mr. Anderson's small, manicured hands signify sterility and unwelcoming, and his caressing of the tomato plant symbolizes his yearning for his dead daughter.  

What kind of king was Ozymandias?

Ozymandias  is the transliteration into Greek  of a part
of Ramesses II's  throne name  User-maat-re Setep-en-re. Ramesses
II who ruled Egypt around 12th century B.C. is regarded as the greatest and most
powerful of all the Pharaohs.


Diodorus Siculus the Greek
historian has recorded one of the inscriptions found at the base of Ramesses II's throne
as "King of Kings am I, Osymandias. If anyone would know how great I am and where I lie,
let him surpass one of my works." It is this inscription which forms the basis for
Shelley's "Ozymandias" (1818).


Ozymandias was obviously a
very proud and arrogant man. He was vain enough to imagine that he was the most powerful
ruler on earth and he wanted every one to be terrified of him. He was always scowling
and frowning in order to scare every one around him. It is this angry frowning face
which the ancient sculptor has faithfully recorded for posterity in his
statue:



a
shattered visage lies, whose frown, 
And wrinkled lip,
and sneer of cold command,



The
Bible tells us in the Book of Proverbs 16:18 that,


readability="6">

“Pride goeth before
destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”



This
is the theme of Shelley's poem. All the great rulers in history try to perpetuate their
memories by building mammoth statues. Their pride and arrogance knows no bounds as they
erect these huge statues and vainly inscribe bombastic claims about the superiority of
the kingdoms which they rule. They do this without realizing that they are only ordinary
mortals who have to return to dust along with all their
endeavors.


The colossal size of the statue only emphasizes
the king sized ego of Ramesses II and only underscores the futility of his attempts to
perpetuate his anonymity, because today,


readability="8">

Nothing beside remains.
Round the decay 
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and
bare


The
lone and level sands stretch far
away.



This
even though when he was alive he had boastfully
claimed,


readability="8">

“My name is Ozymandias,
king of kings: 
Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and
despair!”


Wednesday, September 5, 2012

In All the Pretty Horses, have John Grady and Rawlins broken horses before? Do they seem knowledgeable about it?

Born and bred on Texas ranches, John Grady and Rawlins know just about all there is to know about horses.  Their prowess is tested in the first pages of Chapter 2, when they are presented with "as spooky a bunch of horses...as...ever (seen)" to break.  John Grady audaciously contends that they can break the whole string in four days, and they set out to accomplish this with an unorthodox combination of methods which include rope skill, hobbling techniques, talking to the horses, and patience.  Not only have the boys obviously broken horses before, but they probably have done it together - they work together like clockwork.  When it becomes apparent that they will succeed in their brash boast, a large crowd of local people turn out to watch.

For what is the semicolon [;] used?

There are several uses for semicolons that are called such
since they are composed of one-half of a colon and a comma.  A semicolon is stronger
than a comma, but not as forceful as a
colon.


1.  Use a semicolon between
independent clauses that are closely related in though and that are not joined by a
coordinating conjunction.
(Using a semicolon in this way makes a stronger
statement since the second clause is equal to the first in emphasis without a
conjunction)


e.g. We left at sunrise; we stopped at
sunset.  [NOTE:  Be careful to use the semicolon in this case.  Using a comma is a
serious error in writing courses--called a comma
splice
]


2.  Use a semicolon
between independent clauses joined by a conjunctive adverb or a transitional
expression.


e.g.  The snowfall made
traveling difficult; nevertheless, we arrived home safely.  (See the first site below
for more conjunctive adverbs)


e.g. Dennis plays baseball
well; in fact, he would like to try out for the college's team. (See the second site
below for more transitional words and
phrases)


3.  Use a semicolon between items in
a series if the items contain commas.


e.g. 
The club's pesident has appointed the following people to chair the standing
committees:  Thomas Payne, planning;  Rebecca Washington, membership;  Quincy Adams,
financial; and Anne Wright, legal.


4.  A
semicolon (rather than a comma) may be needed before a coordinating conjunction to join
independent clauses that contain
commas.


e.g.  I wanted to register for
biology, volleyball, and converstional Spanish; but only calculus, golf, and
intermediate French were available during late
registration.


Always remember that the purpose of any
punctuation is clarity.  So when commas will not separate ideas or lists sufficiently,
use the semicolon.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

In Animal Farm, what does the alteration of the first commandment mean?

The First Commandment reads, "Whatever goes on two legs is the enemy."  At the end of the novel, the pigs begin walking on two legs.  Therefore the commandment must be changed in their favour. 

In the course of the novel, the commandments are amended to and changed without the consent of the populace.  Generally, an animal will go to the barn wall to check what the commandment says and find it altered.  This shows that someone (the pigs) are in power and that they have the power to change what was once considered by the whole of the Animal Farm to be unalterable and agreed upon by all.

At the end of the novel, only one commandment is there and it says, "All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."  At the end of the day, all animals are equal but the pigs are 'more' equal.  This is the best example of 'double speak' available.  The less intelligent animals will not think to question this idea.  But in effect, in equality is inequality and the animals are in the same state as they were with Mr. Jones.  The pigs are the new aristocracy.

Monday, September 3, 2012

How and why is Piggy considered by the others to be an outsider?

Piggy is an outsider for many reasons. His health is one. Boys like Ralph are strong and healthy. They are confident in their ability to act. By contrast, Piggy is fat and has asthma. He wears glasses, and his mom has been very protective of him, making him hesitant to act. However, he's also an outsider because he is fundamentally an intellectual. He lives in his mind, while the other boys in their bodies or the community. That makes him seem weird to them.

What are the characteristics of Middle English language?What were the changes occurred? how?

If Middle English is what is employed in the text of the
St. James edition of the Bible, there were still conjugated endings on the verbs. It was
not until the advent of Modern English that conjugated endings were dropped for the most
part and helping verbs added in verb usage.  (He/she says still has
a conjugated ending of -s)


Nouns, however, were no longer
declined; that is, the endings of the nouns did not indicate their case/function in a
sentence as they did in Old English which imitates Latin in this respect.  These case
endings were lost because of the stress shift in Middle English.  The cases were as
follows:


  • nominative   - indicating the subject
    of a sentence

  • accusative    - indicating the direct
    object of a sentence

  • genitive       - indicating
    possession

  • dative          - indicating the indirect
    object

  • instrumental - indicating an instrument used to
    achieve something  (e.g. lifede sweordre, meaning lived by the
    sword.  Since sword is the instrument it is the instrumental form of
    sweord)

Along with losing
conjugated endings, Middle English also dropped the Latin demand for gender agreement. 
Other interesting differences are in spelling:


  • c
    before i or e became chi

  • cw became
    qu

  • sc became sh

  • new
    symbols v and u were added

  • k was used more
    (cyning became
    king
    )

  • a historical h was added to words such
    as honor, heir, herb, habit

  • the infinitive verb ending
    was dropped and "to" was placed before a verb to make an
    infinitive.

  • adjectives lost agreement with nouns in
    gender and number

  • loss of the final
    -n in possessive pronouns (e.g. min
    faeder to mi faeder) and the addition of an
    -n in words beginning with a vowel a napron, a
    nuncle which became an apron, an
    uncle
    )

  • /z/ phoneme was borrowed from French as
    the voiced counterpart for /s/   e.g.
    these

Although the popularity of French was
decreasing after King John lost Normandy to the French in 1250 and after Chaucer's
Canterbury Tales was published as Middle English emerged, nearly
10,000 words were incorporated into the English language.

In Night, what is ironic about the prisoners' feelings about air raids? And explain their attitudes towards death.Chapter 4

The prisoners' attitudes about the air raid are very flippant- they don't really notice, nor do they care. The guards and took refuge in the bomb shelters and left the prisoners on the blocks, not so safely secured, but that was not the prisoner's primary concern. Death was so tangible to all the prisoners at this point that air raid warnings and aerial bomb attacks were welcome interruptions. The prisoners didn't mind dying if it meant that their enemies were going to be hit as well, not to mention that death would end the torturous suffering they had to endure. When it is said that the factory in which Elie's own father is working is being bombed at that moment he remarks,

"we no longer feared death, in any event this particular death. Every bomb that hit filled is with joy, gave us renewed confidence."

When the air raid bomb went off in Chapter 4 the prisoners' concern was not with safety but with two steaming cauldrons of soup that had been left out. Hunger was a more primary instinctual concern than surviving a possible aerial bomb attack, especially since it could mean that the end of the war and suffering of the Jews was close to coming to an end.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

What was Maupassant's main purpose for writing "The Necklace"? What was he trying to show the reader?

The author was to show the difference between something real and false, and how our behavior can be affected by our misperception between the two, just as the protagonist's whole life is changed by mistaking false jewels for real. He also wanted to criticize vanity, especially the kind associated with wealth and materialism. To go beyond your means to look pretty, to be excessively concerned about how others perceive you—a perception based on expensive jewelry (in this story) or (in real life) designer jeans or Prada boots, diminishes your own sense of worth, which should be built on character, not what you wear or how you look.

How does Claudius manipulate Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in the play?

In addition to hiring Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to help
him with Hamlet's depression, Claudius perhaps has planted the seed that Hamlet's
melancholy has resulted from the fact that his ambition to inherit the throne has been
thwarted by Claudius and Gertrude's marriage.  Notice in Act 2 how often Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern use the word "ambition" in their questioning of Hamlet.  It seems here
that  Claudius has commissioned Rosencrantz and Guildenstern not only to find out what
is wrong with Hamlet, but also to determine if Hamlet had past ambitions for the throne,
and if he is still harboring those same ambitions. Claudius obviously views Hamlet as a
true threat, and he is using the two spies in an attempt to find out Hamlet's
motivation.


 Later, Claudius uses Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern to escort Hamlet to England where Claudius plans for him to be executed. 
Of course, this plan does not work, but we are not sure of Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern's knowledge of this plan.  Perhaps they are innocent of the orders they are
carrying.  Perhaps not.  Hamlet likens them to "sponges" or "knee-crooking"
knaves--sychophants that will do whatever they are told to promote their standing with
the king. 

Saturday, September 1, 2012

What is love?

hi


I believe that love is not
words but a sense of.....


what is
love


Love .. Is that sense of invisibility, who is
traveling everywhere and roams the world



In
search of opportunity waiting to caress a sense .. And enchanting eyes
..



To sneak quietly .. And settles in the
absence of reason and in spite of you ..



Within
the cavities of the heart .... To have the spirit and conscience
..



To take control of each entity rights
..



Piece and love is the feeling that possesses
rights in the inside


And round the world where it pleases
grief


Touring everywhere on foam of the sea walk without
sinking in the depths of



Love .. Is so delicious
contagious epidemic, which affects all beings without exception
..



It attracts magnetic objects to each other
..



And without it will not last the life of any
planet ..



For love .. Meanings of the great and
many definitions vary from one lover to another .. Every lover has a vision and
definition of



Special meaning of love
..

What sensory details are used to emphasize each of the five senses, and how do these details add to the story?

I suppose that the feeling of being hot is touch.  So we
see this right off when George starts sweating as soon as the nursery turns on and
becomes Africa.


Bradbury then describes the smells of the
savannah in very graphic terms.  The lions and other animals smell like rust, the dust
smells like paprika.


When Bradbury describes the lions
coming towards George, we get sight and sound and even
taste.


All of these details are important to the story
because they make it seem so real.  The emphasize how the nursery is not just a dream or
a projection.  It is so real that it affects all of your senses.

How far is Iago justified in hating Othello?

Iago hates Othello for some of reasons. First reason could be that Othello promoted Cassio in his place; however, Iago wants it and he cosid...