I do a very similar activity with my twelfth graders, so I hope to give you some insight on what is, at times, the harder point of view to defend. It may be argued that Victor Frankenstein has not crossed the line because he is acting for a greater cause, which is to determine if death can be beat. He is grieving the loss of his mother and wants to provide hope for himself and others who may have suffered the loss of a loved one. This hope lies in the possibility of defying death to achieve immortality. A scientist takes risks to make discoveries beneficial to mankind. As he plans this endeavor, he has no idea that his creature will become a monster. Of course, you don't want to delve into that too much because that would cross over into the other side of the coin that Victor should have shown responsibility for his creation, which in turn might have prevented the resulting monster. Hopefully, this will give you a good starting point!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How far is Iago justified in hating Othello?
Iago hates Othello for some of reasons. First reason could be that Othello promoted Cassio in his place; however, Iago wants it and he cosid...
-
This is in response to sahabia's request for clarification on the first two lines: The chariest maid is prodigal enough If she unmask h...
-
As dusk began to mantle the day and darkness enveloped the land, the nuts vendor began to pack up for the day. This was a signal to the astr...
-
William Hazlitt, known for his biting satirical essays, attacks formal education in "On the Ignorance of the Learned." This essay ...
No comments:
Post a Comment