Hamlet seeks the objective truth of his new situation, believing he has been wrongly overturned from being the Prince/heir to the throne,though his apprehensions puts him in a treasonous position, he perseveres craftily, even after having moral proof, to obtain general objective evidence, in the last scene when Laertes states the King is responsible, even after an interlude when the court, calling 'Treason' , does not make it clear if they mean Hamlet's stabbing of Claudius with the poisoned foil, or Claudius' preparing both it and the poisoned cup which kills Gertrude. At his death, he is vindicated, but he knew the game was very dangerous.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How far is Iago justified in hating Othello?
Iago hates Othello for some of reasons. First reason could be that Othello promoted Cassio in his place; however, Iago wants it and he cosid...
-
This is in response to sahabia's request for clarification on the first two lines: The chariest maid is prodigal enough If she unmask h...
-
As dusk began to mantle the day and darkness enveloped the land, the nuts vendor began to pack up for the day. This was a signal to the astr...
-
William Hazlitt, known for his biting satirical essays, attacks formal education in "On the Ignorance of the Learned." This essay ...
No comments:
Post a Comment